I worked in a Air Force office/shop at the end of my career....where the boss (a Major) was a risk-taker. It was obvious from day one, and you could pretty much guarantee....if a situation came up requiring decision-making....there was a brief moment of concern and a marginal 'minute' pondering consequences....then he'd make the bold move. After a while (a long while)....I got used to it, and started think and react like he did.
What he gave me in terms of perceiving risks and consequences....was this idea that there had to be a 'gain' worth the risk taken.
I came later to the idea that the majority of people simply aren't capable of viewing consequences in their actions, or admitting they committed serious errors in their actions.
When the 'revolutions' started up in the Middle East and refugees started to look for exit/entry signs....the Germans never got into the consequences mindset. Even if you get to 2016....3 years into the migration issues....admitting the consequences was not possible.
AfD being a consequence? You could make that case today. The people who vote for AfD? Well....they used to be CDU-voters, SPD-voters, Linke-voters, FDP-voters, and even Green-voters.
This is one of the odd things that public TV (ARD/ZDF) never really discuss much.
The layer of issues surrounding crime, assaults, and negative public safety numbers? You could make the case that it's really not that bad. Course, you'd be comparing it mostly against data existing around 2010/2012..not the 1990s or 1980s.
The 250,000 on the deportation list? Yeah, that's a consequence.
The PISA study on German educational numbers for 2025....looking crappy? Yeah, that's a consequence.
Blaming someone or some party? I don't think it's really possible at this point. It achieves nothing.
Having a open and fair discussion over consequences? I don't think that's really possible now. You'd have to admit things, and agree to serious resolutions.
Odd problem to have.