If you watched around German news last night (Thursday), the chief topic was the Hanau shooting, the link to right-wing extremism, and how people need to reflect upon supporting the AfD....thus coming to their senses for the regular parties.
The word disinhibition came up.....often.
It generally means that you lack restraint. In terms of impulses, social behavior, and risks....you go to the far extreme on these issues. You assume risks of a fairly significant nature. You act on impulses without thinking of consequences. You frown on accepted social behavior , and go against the 'tide'. In general, your perception of events might not agree with 95-percent of the general public.
How to explain disinhibition occurring in some individual?
This usually leads to four things:
1. You had some accident and bumped your head....thus getting a concussion and maybe brain damage.
2. You are prone to misinterpreting things (a lot). You see a situation occur, and 99-percent of people would act this way.....while you go the opposite way.
3. You get provoked to such a degree.....that acting normal won't work. A good example of this is a guy who has been robbed on the Metro six times in the past three years, and he starts to carry a pistol to shoot the next person to attempt a robbery.
4. Loneliness. You go to the impulse situation just to be different.
As for this guy in Hanau? This guy appears to fit into #3 and #4. On the provoked side, I might suggest more paranoid schizophrenia existing than anything else. This guy wasn't a full-up nutcase, but he was beginning to show indicators of schizophrenia.
But this whole use of the term disinhibition for pushing people to leave their purpose of voting for the AfD? It's probably not going to work because none of the political parties opposing the AfD intend to change or modify their behavior on migration or asylum.
There's little doubt that the bulk of votes that the AfD Party gets in various elections....is frustration-votes. But to rectify frustration-votes, you have to actually go out and view the problem that drew them away, and then do something to show you changed or resolved the original problems. In this case? Doing nothing much.....proves you haven't changed much.
So this is all fake-disinhibition chatter? Yeah....more or less. This does sound good on TV or in forums, when intellectuals beg for your attention. But as you sit through the chatter....waiting for the evidence to come up that the other party modified their behavior...only to find nothing changed, then reality sits in.
It's a good fake political agenda to pick up and use, unless people wise up to your gimmick.
No comments:
Post a Comment