Around early October (2021), this employee (middle-grade) of German public TV....went and published an article. It wasn't on a ARD/ZDF site, and I suspect that 99-percent of newspapers and magazines turned down the commentary.
The guy in question? Ole Skambraks.
So what he talked about? More or less....the forbidden chatter on Covid that you can't dig into, converse about on public TV, or have dialog on.
The North Hessen Journal? They were one of the few that printed the commentary, and I'd recommend a read of article. The American Thinker also printed this, but in a lesser form.
Somewhere in the middle of this written piece....he asks around 13 questions, which haven't been asked in any public forum on German TV.
Some of these questions?
Why does gain-of-function research not get discussed much? I would suggest that if you laid out this entire topic....half of the German public would suddenly get interested and demand know who is doing what and why you can't 'punish' them in some way.
Why can't you treat the people who had Covid....with natural immunity now....like the vaccinated crowd, and thus skip the shot for them?
Why is the run-up period to Covid....treated more like a conspiracy situation than a science-discovery situation?
There is an internal/confidential paper published at the German Interior Ministry over Covid.....which the public TV news people are aware of (suggesting they got a bootleg copy or were told bits and pieces).....but the entire report has never been released to the public or discussed by the public news people....why?
He brings up the Bremen Covid rate (extremely high on 4 Oct 2021 at rate of 113....yet the city has the highest rate of vaccine among any German city....why?
He brings up that the Netherlands reports significant numbers of side-effects.....yet Germans don't see that type of reporting or rates. Purely good health, DNA, or just lazy reporting by the medical establishment? Anyone could make up a fake reason for this....like Germans drinking real beer and that prevented side-effects....but that's fake news. Why not speak to the topic?
Finally, he points out that 99.49 percent of Brits under the age of 70 survive....yet this never gets into newsprint or openly discussed....but on the other hand....there is a bogus clam of half-a-million Brits likely to die getting full front-page reporting (no, the half-a-million didn't die in 2020 as predicted).
He presents a good 20-minute read and it's a viewing. The problem is.....just because you read or view something on ARD/ZDF (public TV in Germany)....does not mean it's conclusive or the end-of-the-discussion.
I've sat at various times over the past six years and noted public forums where you had four experts 'drawing swords' over a topic....going only in one direction, and a single person to set the landscape to the opposing view. So you eventually felt the four won the argument, and the network scored with a public forum selling you (the poor viewer) a bogus commentary.
Unless you go out and spend twenty hours each week....digging through additional information....do you find some commentaries to be weak or misleading.
No comments:
Post a Comment